Representation of
Actions, States and Events in Classification Systems 15-Jul-2007 - 20-Jul-2007 Graz, Austria
Contact: Eva Schultze-Berndt Email: eva.schultzeberndt@uni-graz.at
Call Deadline: 05-Nov-2007
Meeting Description
Representation of Actions, States
and Events in Classification Systems - Universals and Typological Diversity
(Theme Session ICLC 10, Krakow, 2007)
Call for Abstracts for a Theme
Session at the 10th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference in Krakow,
Poland, July 15-20, 2007
Topic: ''Representation of Actions,
States and Events in Classification Systems - Universals and Typological
Diversity''
Organizers: Bill McGregor, Arhus University,
Denmark; linwmg@hum.au.dk Eva Schultze-Berndt, Graz University,
Austria; eva.schultzeberndt@uni-graz.at Thekla Wiebusch, CRLAO, CNRS-EHESS,
Paris, France; thekla.wiebusch@hotmail.fr
Abstracts: Abstracts (for a 20 min. presentation)
should be no longer than 500 words (including examples and references)
and be sent as attached word or text document to Eva Schultze-Berndt
by 5th November 2006.
Proposal text: The theme session will bring
together evidence from different languages and disciplines to shed some light
on features and criteria of human categorization manifested specifically in the
classification of actions, states and events. This domain includes a wide array
of abstract notions and concepts usually associated with verbs. Their
representation in different types of classification systems has received much less
attention than ''nominal'' concepts such as animals, plants or artifacts.
The classification systems taken into consideration here manifest themselves
in either (spoken or signed) language or script: - Numeral classifier systems,
for nouns and for verbs; - Closed-class verbs functioning
as classifiers in complex predicates; - Semantic determinatives in
writing systems; - Event classifiers in sign languages.
The wide range of languages in
which we find these classification systems allow cross-linguistic comparison along
several dimensions. At the same time, the parallel existence of several
classification systems in the same languages makes it possible to distinguish system
specific features from cognitive universals.
Questions to be addressed in this
theme session include: - What are basic concepts, i.e.
basic actions, states or events in the different systems and languages, and are
there universals? - What kind of domain structure
do we find: e.g. prototype members, graded membership, typical taxonomical
or schematic relations between the classifying and classified element? - Which basic features of actions,
states or events - e.g. direction, speed, change of state, duration, repetition,
agency, tools, human sensations etc. play a role in the different classification
systems? Are they parallel to features found for living beings or artefacts,
or do they form independent categories? - Are there correlations between
the function or syntactic features of the different systems and semantic
properties? More specifically: in languages using more than one of the classification
systems, will they show a coherent picture or systematically system-specific
characteristics? - To what extent can we find
synchronic and diachronic variation? Are there universal tendencies of evolution,
and in this case, can they be cognitively, culturally or linguistically
motivated?